Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: duster bounded storage #625

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 4, 2023
Merged

fix: duster bounded storage #625

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 4, 2023

Conversation

Roznovjak
Copy link
Contributor

@Roznovjak Roznovjak commented Jul 4, 2023

This PR removes without_storage_info from the duster pallet.

@Roznovjak Roznovjak self-assigned this Jul 4, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2023

Runtime version has not been increased.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (e952315) 64.94% compared to head (9bc669d) 64.94%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #625   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.94%   64.94%           
=======================================
  Files         132      132           
  Lines        9559     9559           
=======================================
  Hits         6208     6208           
  Misses       3351     3351           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pallets/duster/src/lib.rs 78.37% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@mrq1911 mrq1911 changed the title feat(Duster): bounded storage fix: duster bounded storage Jul 4, 2023
@mrq1911 mrq1911 merged commit d897478 into master Jul 4, 2023
4 checks passed
@Roznovjak Roznovjak deleted the duster_bounded_storage branch July 4, 2023 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants